Theories in Leadership

  • Great Man Theory: the prospect that leaders are born; that experience is less significant in what makes an individual a good leader. The characteristics of a leader are inherent and is not something that can be developed easily.
  • Trait Theory: certain traits, such as personality, intelligence, and abilities, make a leader. Individuals should strive to attain and develop these traits to become an excellent leader.
  • Charismatic Theory: the driving force of leadership is charisma.
  • Situational Theory: the greatest leader depends on the contexts and attributes of the situation; leadership is a “case-by-case” basis.
  • Vroom-Yetton Expectancy Theory: a model of decision-making where the leader determines the amount of participation by followers depending on the situation.
  • Contingency Theory: the most appropriate leadership style is contingent on situational factors.
  • Transformational Leadership Theory: the utilization of group empowerment to allow for success.
  • Transactional Leadership Theory: the utilization of policies, rules, or other written documents for objectives. Performance is important and rewarded or sanctioned.
  • Fielder’s Theory: the style utilized by a leader must match the situation it is being used in. (to-do: differentiate from contingency theory)
  • Path-Goal Theory: the leader is the one to set a path and traverse it along with his followers in achieving a goal, e.g., setting clear directions for a certain objective.

Leadership Styles

  1. Authoritarian; Autocratic; Dictatorial; “HardLeadership: a leadership style that focuses all power towards those in authority or higher positions. Decision-making is done without the influence of the followers or members of the group.
    • Leaders that utilize this style are often task-oriented and insensitive, and subject to dissatisfaction. They often display characteristics like a commanding, boisterous voice; a unilateral approach; a demanding attitude; a hostile personality; exploitative means; and demands no inputs or intervention from others.
    • This style may only become effective in emergent situations.
  2. Permissive; Ultra-liberal; Laissez-Faire; “Free-reinLeadership: a leadership style opposite to a hard leadership, where freedom is freely given to the group, and results are often poor. Decision-making is light on all members of the team and no single individual holds initiative for action.
    • Leaders that utilize this style receive criticism for not taking on major responsibilities, and members often exercise vast and even leadership functions to compensate.
    • This style is dangerous in health care settings because of the risk of malpractice. It may only be utilized if all members of the team are well-trained or skilled.
  3. Democratic; Participative Leadership: the “mutual” style, where the leader exercises his powers and control to all members but allows for the participation of subordinates in the decision-making process. In this style, both the goals of the group and the welfare of its members are valued.
    • This style of leadership is highly valuable as it allows for highly flexible and cohesive group functioning.